The classification, prevalence and impact of selective inclusion and reporting of results in systematic reviews
Published: Feb 22, 2017
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of health care interventions can have a
major impact on clinical practice, research agendas and health care policy-making. However, the
value of systematic reviews is compromised when results of the review are biased. Two sources of
bias that have received limited attention are selective inclusion and selective reporting of results in systematic reviews. Selective inclusion of...
Paper Details
Title
The classification, prevalence and impact of selective inclusion and reporting of results in systematic reviews
Published Date
Feb 22, 2017
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History