Impact bias or underestimation? Outcome specifications predict the direction of affective forecasting errors.

Published on Apr 3, 2017in Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
· DOI :10.1037/XGE0000306
Eva C. Buechel8
Estimated H-index: 8
(USC: University of South Carolina),
Jiao Zhang13
Estimated H-index: 13
(UO: University of Oregon),
Carey K. Morewedge27
Estimated H-index: 27
(BU: Boston University)
Sources
Abstract
: Affective forecasts are used to anticipate the hedonic impact of future events and decide which events to pursue or avoid. We propose that because affective forecasters are more sensitive to outcome specifications of events than experiencers, the outcome specification values of an event, such as its duration, magnitude, probability, and psychological distance, can be used to predict the direction of affective forecasting errors: whether affective forecasters will overestimate or underestimate its hedonic impact. When specifications are positively correlated with the hedonic impact of an event, forecasters will overestimate the extent to which high specification values will intensify and low specification values will discount its impact. When outcome specifications are negatively correlated with its hedonic impact, forecasters will overestimate the extent to which low specification values will intensify and high specification values will discount its impact. These affective forecasting errors compound additively when multiple specifications are aligned in their impact: In Experiment 1, affective forecasters underestimated the hedonic impact of winning a smaller prize that they expected to win, and they overestimated the hedonic impact of winning a larger prize that they did not expect to win. In Experiment 2, affective forecasters underestimated the hedonic impact of a short unpleasant video about a temporally distant event, and they overestimated the hedonic impact of a long unpleasant video about a temporally near event. Experiments 3A and 3B showed that differences in the affect-richness of forecasted and experienced events underlie these differences in sensitivity to outcome specifications, therefore accounting for both the impact bias and its reversal. (PsycINFO Database Record
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
1,114 Citations
33 Citations
8 Citations
References27
Newest
#1Caroline J. Charpentier (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 12
#2Jan-Emmanuel De Neve (University of Oxford)H-Index: 21
Last. Tali Sharot (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 33
view all 5 authors...
Intuitively, how you feel about potential outcomes will determine your decisions. Indeed, an implicit assumption in one of the most influential theories in psychology, prospect theory, is that feelings govern choice. Surprisingly, however, very little is known about the rules by which feelings are transformed into decisions. Here, we specified a computational model that used feelings to predict choices. We found that this model predicted choice better than existing value-based models, showing a ...
29 CitationsSource
#1Carey K. MorewedgeH-Index: 27
#2Hal E. HershfieldH-Index: 19
Last. Hal E. HershfieldH-Index: 1
view all 2 authors...
2 Citations
#1Beyon Miloyan (UQ: University of Queensland)H-Index: 12
#2Thomas Suddendorf (UQ: University of Queensland)H-Index: 48
Affective forecasting refers to the capacity to predict future feelings. Humans have been found to exhibit systematic affective forecasting biases that involve overestimation of the intensity and duration of future feelings. Although recent research has elucidated the proximate mechanisms underlying our ability to predict future feelings, explanations concerning the potential adaptive significance of these biases have attracted little attention. Here we consider the function of affective forecas...
51 CitationsSource
#1Eva C. Buechel (USC: University of South Carolina)H-Index: 8
#2Carey K. Morewedge (BU: Boston University)H-Index: 27
Money is often used as a proxy for utility in economic and psychological research. Monetary sums are easily calculated and compared, and money is a stimulus with which almost all people are familiar. Even so, hedonic responses to monetary gains and losses are relatively insensitive to the absolute size of those gains and losses, and the subjective utility of gains and losses is surprisingly labile. We propose that the difficulty of evaluating the value of money stems from the abstract nature of ...
6 CitationsSource
When people predict how they will feel in response to future events, they typically overestimate the intensity of both negative and positive affect. These affective forecasting errors influence decision making in the present, but the possibility that they serve an adaptive function has been largely overlooked, as has their potential role in psychopathology. In 2 studies, we examined whether the forecasting error for positive events may serve a self-regulatory function by protecting the individua...
15 CitationsSource
#1Linda J. Levine (UCI: University of California, Irvine)H-Index: 35
#2Heather C. Lench (A&M: Texas A&M University)H-Index: 23
Last. Martin A. Safer (CUA: The Catholic University of America)H-Index: 28
view all 4 authors...
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Accuracy and Artifact: Reexamining the Intensity Bias in Affective Forecasting Linda J. Levine, Heather C. Lench, Robin L. Kaplan, and Martin A. Safer Online First Publication, August 13, 2012. doi: 10.1037/a0029544 CITATION Levine, L. J., Lench, H. C., Kaplan, R. L., & Safer, M. A. (2012, August 13). Accuracy and Artifact: Reexamining the Intensity Bias in Affective Forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication...
40 CitationsSource
#1Yaacov Trope (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 84
#2Nira Liberman (TAU: Tel Aviv University)H-Index: 67
People are capable of thinking about the future, the past, remote locations, another person’s perspective, and counterfactual alternatives. Without denying the uniqueness of each process, it is proposed that they constitute different forms of traversing psychological distance. Psychological distance is egocentric: Its reference point is the self in the here and now, and the different ways in which an object might be removed from that point—in time, in space, in social distance, and in hypothetic...
4,152 CitationsSource
#1Jennifer K. Bosson (USF: University of South Florida)H-Index: 35
#2Elizabeth C. Pinel (UVM: University of Vermont)H-Index: 19
Last. Joseph A. Vandello (USF: University of South Florida)H-Index: 26
view all 3 authors...
Research on affective forecasting indicates that people regularly mispredict the emotional impact of negative events. We extended this work by demonstrating several forecasting errors regarding women’s affective reactions to ambivalent sexism. In response to a survey about sexism against women, students at a university in the Central U.S. (N = 188) overestimated the negative impact of hostile sexism, and underestimated the negative impact of benevolent sexism, relative to women’s reports of thei...
68 CitationsSource
#1Lara B. Aknin (UBC: University of British Columbia)H-Index: 21
#2Michael I. Norton (Harvard University)H-Index: 71
Last. Elizabeth W. Dunn (UBC: University of British Columbia)H-Index: 48
view all 3 authors...
While numerous studies have documented the modest (though reliable) link between household income and well-being, we examined the accuracy of laypeople's intuitions about this relationship by asking people from across the income spectrum to report their own happiness and to predict the happiness of others (Study 1) and themselves (Study 2) at different income levels. Data from two national surveys revealed that while laypeople's predictions were relatively accurate at higher levels of income, th...
234 CitationsSource
#1Daniel M. Oppenheimer (Princeton University)H-Index: 29
#2Tom Meyvis (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 18
Last. Nicolas Davidenko (Stanford University)H-Index: 9
view all 3 authors...
Participants are not always as diligent in reading and following instructions as experimenters would like them to be. When participants fail to follow instructions, this increases noise and decreases the validity of their data. This paper presents and validates a new tool for detecting participants who are not following instructions – the Instructional manipulation check (IMC). We demonstrate how the inclusion of an IMC can increase statistical power and reliability of a dataset.
1,583 CitationsSource
Cited By12
Newest
#1Marcin Moroń (University of Silesia in Katowice)H-Index: 3
#2Magdalena Biolik-Moroń (University of Silesia in Katowice)H-Index: 1
The study examined trait emotional intelligence as a predictor for emotional reactions experienced during the first full week of the lockdown in Poland (from 16th to 22nd March). One hundred and thirty persons (101 women and 25 men; 4 did not report their gender)participated in the baseline measurement of trait emotional intelligence, positive and negative affect, and affect intensity and in a one-week daily diary. Trait emotional intelligence correlated positively with baseline positive affect ...
6 CitationsSource
#1Susanne Grüner (Braunschweig University of Technology)H-Index: 1
#2Mark Vollrath (Braunschweig University of Technology)H-Index: 19
Abstract A promising approach to avoid congestion is to distribute traffic in the street network in a system-optimal manner. This could be calculated by a centralized traffic management system to be communicated as route advice. However, human drivers can independently decide whether to follow the route advice or to dissent. When trying to influence route choice, drivers’ travel experiences may influence their reaction to route advice. When recalling past events, people tend to remember the extr...
Source
#1Athanasios Polyportis (OPA: Athens University of Economics and Business)
#2Flora Kokkinaki (OPA: Athens University of Economics and Business)H-Index: 14
Last. Georgios Christopoulos (NTU: Nanyang Technological University)H-Index: 5
view all 4 authors...
The impact of incidental emotions on decision making is well established. Incidental emotions can be differentiated on several appraisal dimensions, including certainty–uncertainty. The present research investigates the effect of certainty–uncertainty of incidental emotions on hedonic forecasting. The results of four experimental studies indicate that uncertainty-associated incidental emotions, such as fear and hope, compared with certainty emotions, such as anger and happiness, amplify predicte...
Source
#1Camille Schwartz (CNRS: Centre national de la recherche scientifique)H-Index: 14
#2Christine Lange (CNRS: Centre national de la recherche scientifique)H-Index: 10
Last. Pierre Chandon (University of Paris)H-Index: 35
view all 6 authors...
Large portion sizes encourage overconsumption. Prior studies suggest that this may be due to errors in anticipating the effects of portion size, although the studies were limited to adults and energy-dense foods. Our aim was to investigate potential anticipation errors related to the effects of portion size on hunger, eating enjoyment, and healthiness ratings among 8-to-11-year-old children, for snacks differing in energy density and healthiness perception, and as a function of initial hunger. I...
1 CitationsSource
#1Hallgeir Sjåstad (NHH: Norwegian School of Economics)H-Index: 5
#2Roy F. Baumeister (UQ: University of Queensland)H-Index: 173
Last. Michael R. Ent (TU: Towson University)H-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
Abstract Across six experiments (N = 1304), people dealt with failure by dismissing the value of future goals. Participants were randomly assigned to receive good or poor feedback on a practice trial of a cognitive test (Studies 1–3, 5–6) or their academic performance (Study 4). Those who received poor (vs. good) feedback predicted that they would feel less happy about a future top performance. However, when all participants received a top score on the actual test they became equally happy, rega...
4 CitationsSource
#1Daniella Kupor (BU: Boston University)H-Index: 9
#2Kristin LaurinH-Index: 19
6 CitationsSource
#1Carey K. Morewedge (BU: Boston University)H-Index: 27
#2Meng Zhu (Johns Hopkins University)H-Index: 9
Last. Eva C. Buechel (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 8
view all 3 authors...
5 CitationsSource
#1Charles Dorison (Harvard University)H-Index: 2
#2Julia A. Minson (Harvard University)H-Index: 11
Last. Todd Rogers (Harvard University)H-Index: 28
view all 3 authors...
Abstract People preferentially consume information that aligns with their prior beliefs, contributing to polarization and undermining democracy. Five studies (collective N = 2455) demonstrate that such “selective exposure” partly stems from faulty affective forecasts. Specifically, political partisans systematically overestimate the strength of negative affect that results from exposure to opposing views. In turn, these incorrect forecasts drive information consumption choices. Clinton voters ov...
9 CitationsSource
#1Maria Luz Gonzalez-Gadea (CONICET: National Scientific and Technical Research Council)H-Index: 9
#2Agustín IbáñezH-Index: 62
Last. Mariano Sigman (CONICET: National Scientific and Technical Research Council)H-Index: 58
view all 3 authors...
Schadenfreude (i.e., the pleasure derived from another’s misfortune) has been widely studied by having participants imagine how they would feel in hypothetical scenarios describing another person’s pain or misfortune. However, research on affective forecasting shows that self-judgments of emotions are inaccurate in hypothetical situations. Here we show a study in which we first presented a hypothetical schadenfreude situation and few months later, due to an exceptional circumstance, the situatio...
3 CitationsSource
#1Eva C. Buechel (USC: University of South Carolina)H-Index: 8
#2Claudia Townsend (UM: University of Miami)H-Index: 12
9 CitationsSource