Formal and Social Enforcement in Response to Individual Versus Corporate Transgressions

Published on Dec 1, 2016in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
· DOI :10.1111/JELS.12133
Uriel Haran7
Estimated H-index: 7
(BGU: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev),
Doron Teichman9
Estimated H-index: 9
(HUJI: Hebrew University of Jerusalem),
Yuval Feldman12
Estimated H-index: 12
(BIU: Bar-Ilan University)
Sources
Abstract
Social enforcement of norms governing appropriate business practices, through online and social networks, is regarded as an effective alternative to formal, state‐sponsored enforcement. However, recent research finds that such norms are interpreted differently when applied to individual actors than when applied to corporations. This article finds that this difference transcends to enforcement, and that willingness to actively respond to a transgression depends on both the transgressor's identity and the type of violation. Three studies found that people are reluctant to substitute social enforcement for state‐sponsored action, and that the preference for formal over social action was generally more pronounced when the target of the action was an individual than when the action targeted a corporation. Furthermore, individuals were judged more severely for intentional harms, whereas corporations received higher levels of critique for violations caused by negligent behavior. Our findings suggest that the state may need to exercise caution in outsourcing norm enforcement in commercial relationships.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
1 Citations
48 Citations
9 Citations
References29
Newest
#1Tage S. Rai (NU: Northwestern University)H-Index: 9
#2Daniel Diermeier (NU: Northwestern University)H-Index: 38
Across four experiments, participants saw companies as capable of having ‘agentic’ mental states, such as having intentions, but incapable of having ‘experiential’ mental states, such as feeling pain. This difference in mental state ascription caused companies to elicit anger as villains, but not sympathy as victims. Differences in sympathy were mediated by perceived capacities for experience. When participants had a background leading companies (i.e. senior executives) or when a recognizable br...
34 CitationsSource
#1Uriel Haran (BGU: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)H-Index: 7
Most legal systems in the world follow the principle of corporate personhood, which grants organizations the same legal status as natural persons. Although debate over the notion of corporate personhood has been fierce, whether and how this principle is applied in people's beliefs and intuitions has yet to be empirically examined. This work addresses the gap in the literature, in the context of formal contracts. While contracts are typically seen as either morally binding promises or morally neu...
16 CitationsSource
#1Yuval Feldman (BIU: Bar-Ilan University)H-Index: 12
In recent years, leading legal scholars have proposed many competing models for the expressive function of the law. This article attempts to organize and compare the competing models while examining a real-life dilemma—sharing confidential information when one moves from one company to another—and explores the mechanisms through which the law can affect people's behavior. The article examines the expressive impact that results when trade secret laws are experimentally “primed” on factors such as...
28 CitationsSource
#1Yuval Feldman (BIU: Bar-Ilan University)H-Index: 12
#2Orly Lobel (USD: University of San Diego)H-Index: 16
Social enforcement, the decentralized action by organizational actors of monitoring, identifying, and reporting legal violations, is widely recognized as a key factor in ensuring good governance. This article reports on an experimental survey conducted in the US and Israel examining the behavior of individuals when confronting workplace unlawful conduct. The study provides novel insights into the relationships between state based, organization based, and employee based enforcement. It finds that...
22 CitationsSource
#1Joshua Knobe (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 50
#2Jesse Prinz (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 8
Last. Jesse J. Prinz (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 15
view all 2 authors...
When people are trying to determine whether an entity is capable of having certain kinds of mental states, they can think of it either from a functional standpoint or from a physical standpoint. We conducted a series of studies to determine how each of these standpoints impact people’s mental state ascriptions. The results point to a striking difference between two kinds of states—those that involve phenomenal consciousness and those that do not. Specifically, it appears that ascriptions of stat...
132 CitationsSource
#1Christoph Hauert (Harvard University)H-Index: 45
#2Arne TraulsenH-Index: 66
Last. Karl SigmundH-Index: 72
view all 5 authors...
In human societies, cooperative behavior in joint enterprises is often enforced through institutions that impose sanctions on defectors. Many experiments on so-called public goods games have shown that in the absence of such institutions, individuals are willing to punish defectors, even at a cost to themselves. Theoretical models confirm that social norms prescribing the punishment of uncooperative behavior are stable—once established, they prevent dissident minorities from spreading. But how c...
564 CitationsSource
This paper establishes that there may be an inverse relation between the rate of detection and the deterrent effects of stigma. The more people are detected and stigmatized, the less deterrence there may be. This conclusion is based on a search model in which the costs of searching for law-abiding partners increase with the rate of detection. The model distinguishes between willing stigmatizers, who refrain from business or social contacts with someone they believe has committed an offense (whet...
28 CitationsSource
#1Heather Gray (Harvard University)H-Index: 180
#1Heather Gray (Harvard University)H-Index: 31
Last. Daniel M. Wegner (Harvard University)H-Index: 85
view all 3 authors...
Participants compared the mental capacities of various human and nonhuman characters via online surveys. Factor analysis revealed two dimensions of mind perception, Experience (for example, capacity for hunger) and Agency (for example, capacity for self-control). The dimensions predicted different moral judgments but were both related to valuing of mind.
767 CitationsSource
#1Armin FalkH-Index: 83
#2Ernst FehrH-Index: 143
Last. Urs FischbacherH-Index: 64
view all 3 authors...
This paper investigates the driving forces behind informal sanctions in cooperation games and the extent to which theories of fairness and reciprocity capture these forces. We find that cooperators' punishment is almost exclusively targeted toward the defectors, but the latter also impose a considerable amount of spiteful punishment on the cooperators. However, spiteful punishment vanishes if the punishers can no longer affect the payoff differences between themselves and the punished individual...
315 CitationsSource
#1Jeffrey P. Carpenter (Middlebury College)H-Index: 41
#2Peter Hans Matthews (Middlebury College)H-Index: 13
Last. Okomboli Ong’ong’a (Stanford University)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
Recently economists have become interested in why people who face social dilemmas in the experimental lab use the seemingly incredible threat of punishment to deter free riding. Three theories have evolved to explain punishment. We survey each theory and se behavioral data from surveys and experiments to show that the theory called social reciprocity in which people punish norm violators indiscriminately explains punishment best. We also show that social reciprocity can evolve in a population of...
94 CitationsSource
Cited By2
Newest
#1Ariel Tikotsky (BIU: Bar-Ilan University)H-Index: 1
#2Eyal Peer (HUJI: Hebrew University of Jerusalem)H-Index: 19
Last. Yuval Feldman (BIU: Bar-Ilan University)H-Index: 12
view all 3 authors...
Abstract Behaviorally informed interventions are growingly used to nudge consumers for various goals. While consumers are usually the target of nudges, businesses are involved in nudges in two manners: either they are the target of the nudges (i.e., government-to-business, or G2B nudges), or they serve as “nudging agents" on behalf of government regulation (i.e., government-to-business-to-consumer, or G2B2C nudges). Businesses’ support of nudges might be critical for nudges' success, but the per...
3 CitationsSource