Review paper
Are placebo and drug-specific effects additive? Questioning basic assumptions of double-blinded randomized clinical trials and presenting novel study designs
Abstract
Double-blinded randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assume that pharmacological interventions have drug-specific and unspecific components. Traditional RCTs postulate an additivity of these two components. In this review, we provide evidence from both clinical trials and experimental studies that questions this 'additive model'. Given that the evaluation of drug treatments in RCTs is based on the assumption of additivity, its violation has...
Paper Details
Title
Are placebo and drug-specific effects additive? Questioning basic assumptions of double-blinded randomized clinical trials and presenting novel study designs
Published Date
Apr 1, 2017
Journal
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
729 - 735
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History