Methods for dealing with multiple outcomes in meta-analysis:a comparison between averaging effect sizes, robust variance estimation and multilevel meta-analysis

Volume: 20, Issue: 6, Pages: 559 - 572
Published: Nov 13, 2016
Abstract
This study investigates three methods to handle dependency among effect size estimates in meta-analysis arising from studies reporting multiple outcome measures taken on the same sample. The three-level approach is compared with the method of robust variance estimation, and with averaging effects within studies. A simulation study is performed, and the fixed and random effect estimates of the three methods are compared with each other. Both the...
Paper Details
Title
Methods for dealing with multiple outcomes in meta-analysis:a comparison between averaging effect sizes, robust variance estimation and multilevel meta-analysis
Published Date
Nov 13, 2016
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
559 - 572
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.