Association Between Hospital Participation in a Medicare Bundled Payment Initiative and Payments and Quality Outcomes for Lower Extremity Joint Replacement Episodes

Published on Sep 27, 2016in JAMA45.54
· DOI :10.1001/JAMA.2016.12717
Laura A. Dummit3
Estimated H-index: 3
,
Daver C. Kahvecioglu7
Estimated H-index: 7
(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)
+ 11 AuthorsPatrick H. Conway37
Estimated H-index: 37
(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)
Sources
Abstract
Importance Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) is a voluntary initiative of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to test the effect of holding an entity accountable for all services provided during an episode of care on episode payments and quality of care. Objective To evaluate whether BPCI was associated with a greater reduction in Medicare payments without loss of quality of care for lower extremity joint (primarily hip and knee) replacement episodes initiated in BPCI-participating hospitals that are accountable for total episode payments (for the hospitalization and Medicare-covered services during the 90 days after discharge). Design, Setting, and Participants A difference-in-differences approach estimated the differential change in outcomes for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who had a lower extremity joint replacement at a BPCI-participating hospital between the baseline (October 2011 through September 2012) and intervention (October 2013 through June 2015) periods and beneficiaries with the same surgical procedure at matched comparison hospitals. Exposure Lower extremity joint replacement at a BPCI-participating hospital. Main Outcomes and Measures Standardized Medicare-allowed payments (Medicare payments), utilization, and quality (unplanned readmissions, emergency department visits, and mortality) during hospitalization and the 90-day postdischarge period. Results There were 29 441 lower extremity joint replacement episodes in the baseline period and 31 700 in the intervention period (mean [SD] age, 74.1 [8.89] years; 65.2% women) at 176 BPCI-participating hospitals, compared with 29 440 episodes in the baseline period (768 hospitals) and 31 696 episodes in the intervention period (841 hospitals) (mean [SD] age, 74.1 [8.92] years; 64.9% women) at matched comparison hospitals. The BPCI mean Medicare episode payments were 30 551 (95% CI, 0 201 to 30 901) in the baseline period and declined by 286 to 27 265 (95% CI, 6 838 to 27 692) in the intervention period. The comparison mean Medicare episode payments were 0 057 (95% CI, 29 765 to 0 350) in the baseline period and declined by 2119 to 7 938 (95% CI, 27 639 to 8 237). The mean Medicare episode payments declined by an estimated 1166 more (95% CI, −634 to −$699; P Conclusions and Relevance In the first 21 months of the BPCI initiative, Medicare payments declined more for lower extremity joint replacement episodes provided in BPCI-participating hospitals than for those provided in comparison hospitals, without a significant change in quality outcomes. Further studies are needed to assess longer-term follow-up as well as patterns for other types of clinical care.
Figures & Tables
Download
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
177 Citations
187 Citations
106 Citations
References14
Newest
#1Matthew J. Press (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)H-Index: 16
#2Rahul Rajkumar (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)H-Index: 17
Last. Patrick H. Conway (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)H-Index: 37
view all 3 authors...
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is increasingly paying for health care through alternative payment models (APMs) that reward value and quality. Currently, more than 20% of Medicare fee-for-service payments flow through APMs, putting the Administration’s goals of 30% by 2016 and 50% by 2018 within reach.1 These APMs include accountable care organizations (ACOs), bundled payments, and advanced primary care medical homes. In this Viewpoint, we discuss the role of bundled payments...
117 CitationsSource
: This final rule implements a new Medicare Part A and B payment model under section 1115A of the Social Security Act, called the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model, in which acute care hospitals in certain selected geographic areas will receive retrospective bundled payments for episodes of care for lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR) or reattachment of a lower extremity. All related care within 90 days of hospital discharge from the joint replacement procedure will be in...
110 Citations
#1Cecily Corrine Froemke (Providence Health & Services)H-Index: 2
#2Lian Wang (Providence Health & Services)H-Index: 11
Last. Paul J. Duwelius (Providence St. Vincent Medical Center)H-Index: 3
view all 6 authors...
Abstract Increasing demands for episodic bundled payments in total hip and knee arthroplasty are motivating providers to wring out inefficiencies and coordinate services. This study describes a care pathway and gainshare arrangement as the mechanism by which improvements in efficiency were realized under a bundled payment pilot. Analysis of cut-to-close time, LOS, discharge destination, implant cost, and total allowed claims between pre-pilot and pilot cohorts showed an 18% reduction in average ...
68 CitationsSource
#1Mark W. FriedbergH-Index: 32
#2Peggy G. ChenH-Index: 15
Last. Lisa LipinskiH-Index: 1
view all 13 authors...
: The project reported here, sponsored by the American Medical Association (AMA), aimed to describe the effects that alternative health care payment models (i.e., models other than fee-for-service payment) have on physicians and physician practices in the United States. These payment models included capitation, episode-based and bundled payment, shared savings, pay for performance, and retainer-based practice. Accountable care organizations and medical homes, which are two recently expanding pra...
33 Citations
New targets have been set for value-based payment: 85% of Medicare fee-for-service payments should be tied to quality or value by 2016, and 30% of Medicare payments should be tied to quality or value through alternative payment models by 2016 (50% by 2018).
736 CitationsSource
#1James P. Doran (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 4
Abstract In the setting of current United States healthcare reform, bundled payment initiatives and episode of care payment models for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have become increasingly common. The following is a review of our results and experience in a community hospital with bundled payment initiatives for both non-Medicare and Medicare TJA patients since 2011. We have successfully decreased the cost of the TJA episode of care in comparison to our historical averages prior to 2011. This ...
55 CitationsSource
#1Thomas C. Tsai (Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation)H-Index: 20
#2Karen E. Joynt (Harvard University)H-Index: 34
Last. Ashish K. Jha (Harvard University)H-Index: 95
view all 5 authors...
The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative is a federally funded innovation model mandated by the Affordable Care Act. It is designed to help transition Medicare away from fee-for-service payments and toward bundling a single payment for an episode of acute care in a hospital and related postacute care in an appropriate setting. While results from the initiative will not be available for several years, current data can help provide critical early insights. However, little is known abou...
54 CitationsSource
#1Lee N. Newcomer (UnitedHealth Group)H-Index: 13
#2Bruce Gould (UnitedHealth Group)H-Index: 1
Last. Monica Perkins (UnitedHealth Group)H-Index: 3
view all 5 authors...
This study tested the combination of an episode payment coupled with actionable use and quality data as an incentive to improve quality and reduce costs. Methods: Medical oncologists were paid a single fee, in lieu of any drug margin, to treat their patients. Chemotherapy medications were reimbursed at the average sales price, a proxy for actual cost. Results: Five volunteer medical groups were compared with a large national payer registry of fee-for-service patients with can- cer to examine the...
87 CitationsSource
Episode-based payment, one of the payment reforms in the Affordable Care Act, aims to create incentives for efficiency and better care coordination. But it's more complex to administer than fee for service or capitation and faces substantial implementation challenges.
64 CitationsSource
#1Trudy Mallinson (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 21
#2Jillian Bateman (Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago)H-Index: 3
Last. Allen W. Heinemann (NU: Northwestern University)H-Index: 74
view all 7 authors...
Abstract Mallinson TR, Bateman J, Tseng H-Y, Manheim L, Almagor O, Deutsch A, Heinemann AW. A comparison of discharge functional status after rehabilitation in skilled nursing, home health, and medical rehabilitation settings for patients after lower-extremity joint replacement surgery. Objective To examine differences in outcomes of patients after lower-extremity joint replacement across 3 post–acute care (PAC) rehabilitation settings. Design Prospective observational cohort study. Setting Skil...
81 CitationsSource
Cited By185
Newest
#1Karen E. Joynt Maddox (WashU: Washington University in St. Louis)H-Index: 20
#2Michael L. Barnett (Brigham and Women's Hospital)H-Index: 36
Last. Arnold M. Epstein (Brigham and Women's Hospital)H-Index: 105
view all 6 authors...
BACKGROUND Model 3 of Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) was a voluntary alternative payment model that held participating skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) accountable for 90-day costs of care. Its overall impact on Medicare spending and clinical outcomes is unknown. METHODS Retrospective cohort study using Medicare claims from 2012 to 2017. We used an interrupted time-series design to compare participating vs matched control SNFs on total 90-day Medicare payments and payme...
Source
#1Amol S. Navathe (Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics)H-Index: 16
#2Joshua M. Liao (Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics)H-Index: 13
Last. Rachel M. Werner (Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics)H-Index: 41
view all 0 authors...
Importance null It is unknown how outcomes are affected when patients receive care under bundled payment and accountable care organization (ACO) programs simultaneously. null Objective null To evaluate whether outcomes in the Medicare Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) program differed depending on whether patients were attributed to ACOs in the Medicare Shared Savings Program. null Design, Setting, and Participants null This cohort study was conducted using Medicare claims data from J...
Source
#1Kevin Pritchard (UTMB: University of Texas Medical Branch)H-Index: 3
#1Kevin Pritchard (UTMB: University of Texas Medical Branch)H-Index: 1
Last. Kenneth J. Ottenbacher (UTMB: University of Texas Medical Branch)H-Index: 84
view all 6 authors...
Abstract Objectives Understand the association between social determinants of health and community discharge after elective total joint arthroplasty. Design Retrospective cohort design using Optum de-identified electronic health record dataset. Setting and Participants A total of 38 hospital networks and 18 non-network hospitals in the United States; 79,725 patients with total hip arthroplasty and 136,070 patients with total knee arthroplasty between 2011 and 2018. Methods Logistic regression mo...
1 CitationsSource
#1Ahmed SiddiqiH-Index: 7
#2Jared A. Warren (Cleveland Clinic)H-Index: 6
Last. Nicolas S. Piuzzi (Cleveland Clinic)H-Index: 25
view all 6 authors...
BACKGROUND An overall assessment of how patient demographic characteristics and comorbidities are improving or worsening can allow better understanding of the value of revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify patient demographic characteristics and comorbidities trends and episode-of-care outcome trends from 2008 to 2018 in patients undergoing revision TJA. METHODS The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to ident...
Source
INTRODUCTION A comprehensive understanding of the trends for financial reimbursement of shoulder arthroplasty is important as progress is made toward achieving sustainable payment models in orthopaedics. This study analyzes Medicare reimbursement trends for shoulder arthroplasty. We hypothesize that Medicare reimbursement has decreased for shoulder arthroplasty procedures from 2000 to 2020 and that revision procedures have experienced greater decreases in reimbursement. METHODS The Physician Fee...
Source
#1Karen E. Joynt Maddox (WashU: Washington University in St. Louis)H-Index: 20
#2E. John Orav (Harvard University)H-Index: 110
Last. Arnold M. Epstein (Harvard University)H-Index: 105
view all 4 authors...
Importance Medicare’s Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) program, which ran from 2013 to 2018, was an important experiment in physician-focused alternative payment models. However, little is known about whether the program was associated with better quality or outcomes or lower costs. Objective To determine whether participation in BPCI among physician group practices was associated with advantageous or deleterious changes in costs or patient outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants...
1 CitationsSource
#1Reena Duseja (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)H-Index: 2
#2Joel Andress (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)H-Index: 1
Last. Thomas E. MaCurdy (Stanford University)H-Index: 33
view all 16 authors...
Importance The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), established as part of the Quality Payment Program, is a Medicare value-based payment program that evaluates clinicians' performance across 4 categories: quality, cost, promoting interoperability, and improvement activities. The cost category includes novel episode-based measures designed for targeted evaluation of the resource use of specific conditions. This report describes the development of episode-based cost measures and their rol...
1 CitationsSource
Abstract In this paper, we examine the effects of the State Innovation Models Initiative (SIM) on population-level health status. SIM provided $250 million to six states in 2013 for broad delivery system reforms. We use data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for the years 2010 - 2016. Our sample is restricted to individuals ages 45 and older residing in 6 SIM and 15 control states. Treatment effects in a difference-in-difference design are estimated using a latent factor model ...
Source
#1Caroline P. Thirukumaran (UR: University of Rochester)H-Index: 9
#2Yeunkyung Kim (UR: University of Rochester)H-Index: 4
Last. Laurent G. Glance (UR: University of Rochester)H-Index: 43
view all 8 authors...
Importance The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model is Medicare's mandatory bundled payment reform to improve quality and spending for beneficiaries who need total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR), yet it does not account for sociodemographic risk factors such as race/ethnicity and income. Results of this study could be the basis for a Medicare payment reform that addresses inequities in joint replacement care. Objective To examine the association of the CJR ...
1 CitationsSource
#1Jonas WohlinH-Index: 1
#2Clara Fischer (KI: Karolinska Institutet)
Last. Mats Brommels (KI: Karolinska Institutet)H-Index: 27
view all 8 authors...
BACKGROUND New Public Management (NPM) has been widely used to introduce competition into public healthcare. Results have been mixed, and there has been much controversy about the appropriateness of a private sector-mimicking governance model in a public service. One voice in the debate suggested that rather than discussing whether competition is "good" or "bad" the emphasis should be on exploring the conditions for a successful implementation. METHODS We report a longitudinal case study of the ...
Source