Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

Volume: 62, Issue: 10, Pages: 1006 - 1012
Published: Oct 1, 2009
Abstract
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasingly important in health care. Clinicians read them to keep up to date with their field [1,2], and they are often used as a starting point for developing clinical practice guidelines. Granting agencies may require a systematic review to ensure there is justification for further research [3], and some health care journals are moving in this direction [4]. As with all research, the value of...
Paper Details
Title
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Published Date
Oct 1, 2009
Volume
62
Issue
10
Pages
1006 - 1012
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.