Genetically modified maize : less drudgery for her, more maize for him? Evidence from smallholder maize farmers in South Africa

Published on Jul 1, 2016in World Development
· DOI :10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2016.03.008
Marthinus Gouse1
Estimated H-index: 1
(University of Pretoria),
Debdatta Sengupta7
Estimated H-index: 7
(IFPRI: International Food Policy Research Institute)
+ 1 AuthorsJose Falck Zepeda4
Estimated H-index: 4
(IFPRI: International Food Policy Research Institute)
Genetically modified (GM) crop technologies have made great strides since its first introduction in 1996. Although there is an extensive and growing body of literature on the economic impact of the adoption of GM crops in both developing and developed economies, there is only scant evidence that the technology has had any specific and distinguishable impact among female and male farmers. In economies where female farmers and female household members have a significant and often differentiated role in agriculture production, it is crucial to be able to answer this question. This paper presents quantitative and qualitative results from a study of the gender-specific adoption and performance effects of insect resistant (Bt) and herbicide-tolerant (HT) maize produced by smallholder farmers in the Kwa Zulu Natal province in South Africa. The findings indicate that women farmers value the labor-saving benefit of HT maize alongside the stacked varieties which offer both insect control and labor saving. Higher yields are the main reason behind male adoption, while female farmers tend to favor other aspects like taste, quality, and the ease of farming herbicide-tolerant (HT) crops. Women farmers (and also children) saved significant time because less weeding is required, an activity that has traditionally been the responsibility of female farmers. The newer stacked varieties were preferred by both male and female farmers and seemed to be in high demand by both groups. However, lack of GM seed availability in the region and poor market access were possible limitations to the adoption and spread of the technology.
Figures & Tables
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
10 Citations
2 Citations
4 Citations
#1Hossein Azadi (Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech)H-Index: 29
#2Atry Samiee (UT: University of Tehran)H-Index: 1
Last. Frank Witlox (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 71
view all 7 authors...
AbstractAlthough some important features of genetically modified (GM) crops such as insect resistance, herbicide tolerance, and drought tolerance might seem to be beneficial for small-scale farmers, the adoption of GM technology by smallholders is still slight. Identifying pros and cons of using this technology is important to understand the impacts of GM crops on these farmers. This article reviews the main opportunities and challenges of GM crops for small-scale farmers in developing countries...
18 CitationsSource
#1Wilhelm Klümper (GAU: University of Göttingen)H-Index: 1
#2Matin Qaim (GAU: University of Göttingen)H-Index: 75
Background Despite the rapid adoption of genetically modified (GM) crops by farmers in many countries, controversies about this technology continue. Uncertainty about GM crop impacts is one reason for widespread public suspicion. Objective We carry out a meta-analysis of the agronomic and economic impacts of GM crops to consolidate the evidence. Data Sources Original studies for inclusion were identified through keyword searches in ISI Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, EconLit, and AgEcon Search...
367 CitationsSource
#1Elizabeth Hull (SOAS, University of London)H-Index: 8
This article examines the relationship between unemployment, family structure, and labor allocation in rural South Africa. Chronic joblessness has meant that many young, unemployed adults remain in the parental home. However, their productive labor is often not utilized in family farming. Using detailed ethnographic data on intra-household social relations, I argue that the prohibitive cost of marriage, and its consequent decline, has led to the erosion of obligations formerly implied by the “co...
10 CitationsSource
#1Santi Sanglestsawai (Kasetsart University)H-Index: 2
#2Roderick M. Rejesus (NCSU: North Carolina State University)H-Index: 20
Last. Jose M. Yorobe (UPLB: University of the Philippines Los Baños)H-Index: 10
view all 3 authors...
There have been serious questions about whether lower-yielding farmers in developing countries, who are typically poor smallholders, benefit from genetically-modified crops like Bacillus thuringensis (Bt) corn. This article examines this issue by estimating the heterogeneous impacts of Bt corn adoption at different points of the yield distribution using farm-level survey data from the Philippines. A recently developed estimation technique called instrumental variable quantile regression (IVQR) i...
16 CitationsSource
#1Amber Peterman (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 32
#2Julia Andrea Behrman (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 18
Last. Agnes R. Quisumbing (IFPRI: International Food Policy Research Institute)H-Index: 75
view all 3 authors...
Empirical research on gender dimensions in agricultural inputs has focused on land. This chapter reviews existing microeconomic empirical literature from the past 10 years on gender differences in use, access, and adoption of nonland agricultural inputs in developing countries. The review focuses on three key areas: (1) technological resources, (2) natural resources, and (3) human resources. In general, there has been more empirical research on inorganic fertilizer, seed varieties, and extension...
190 CitationsSource
The present paper presents a meta-analysis of the economic and agronomic performance of genetically modified (GM) crops worldwide. Bayesian, classical and non-parametric approaches were used to evaluate the performance of GM crops v. their conventional counterparts. The two main GM crop traits (herbicide tolerant (HT) and insect resistant (Bt)) and three of the main GM crops produced worldwide (Bt cotton, HT soybean and Bt maize) were analysed in terms of yield, production cost and gross margin....
62 CitationsSource
#1Gurdev S. Khush (UC Davis: University of California, Davis)H-Index: 77
The major scientific advances of the last century featured the identification of the structure of DNA, the development of molecular biology and the technology to exploit these advances. These breakthroughs gave us new tools for crop improvement, including molecular marker-aided selection (MAS) and genetic modification (GM). MAS improves the efficiency of breeding programs, and GM allows us to accomplish breeding objectives not possible through conventional breeding approaches. MAS is not controv...
17 CitationsSource
#1Patricia Zambrano (IFPRI: International Food Policy Research Institute)H-Index: 14
#2Melinda SmaleH-Index: 49
Last. Sandra Mendoza (KTH: Royal Institute of Technology)H-Index: 3
view all 4 authors...
Although the literature on gender in agriculture is extensive, gender has been under studied in the published literature about biotech crops in developing countries. To explore whether gender affects access to and use of biotech cotton, we developed and tested a participatory, qualitative approach. Despite the perception that women participate little in cotton production in Colombia, some women manage their own plots, and many share production responsibilities with their spouses. Men and women p...
5 Citations
#1Marnus GouseH-Index: 10
29 Citations
#1Robert FingerH-Index: 32
#2Nadja El BenniH-Index: 9
Last. Nataliya StupakH-Index: 2
view all 8 authors...
This paper reviews the evidence on the socio-economic impacts of GM crops and analyzes whether there are patterns across space and time. To this end, we investigate the effect of GM crops on farm-level costs and benefits using global data from more than one decade of field trials and surveys. More specifically, we analyze the effects of GM-crops on crop yields, seed costs, pesticide costs, and management and labor costs and finally gross margins. Based on collected data from studies on Bt cotton...
68 CitationsSource
Cited By15
#1Vidya Vemireddy (IIMA: Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad)H-Index: 3
#2Anjali Choudhary (IIMA: Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad)
Abstract In this study, we systematically review the literature on adoption factors and impacts of labor-saving technologies (LSTs) by smallholder and women farmers in developing countries. 85 articles are included in the review after meeting strict selection criteria through a search across several electronic platforms. We highlight several research gaps that need future research focus. Future research should include gendered differences in factors such as – comparing extension models, social n...
#1Kristiina Ala-Kokko (UA: University of Arkansas)
#2Lawton Lanier Nalley (UA: University of Arkansas)H-Index: 17
Last. Marijke D'Haese (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 19
view all 7 authors...
Abstract White maize in South Africa is the only staple crop produced on a widespread commercial basis for direct human consumption using genetically modified (GM) cultivars. Using a combined economic and environmental approach, we estimate the total welfare benefits attributable to GM white maize in South Africa for 2001–2018 are $694.7 million. Food security benefits attributable to GM white maize in South Africa also manifest through an average of 4.6 million additional white maize rations an...
#1Stuart J. Smyth (U of S: University of Saskatchewan)H-Index: 21
#2Alan McHughen (UCR: University of California, Riverside)H-Index: 26
Last. Wayne A. Parrott (UGA: University of Georgia)H-Index: 60
view all 6 authors...
Genetically modified (GM) organisms and crops have been a feature of food production for over 30 years. Despite extensive science-based risk assessment, the public and many politicians remain concerned with the genetic manipulation of crops, particularly food crops. Many governments have addressed public concern through biosafety legislation and regulatory frameworks that identify and regulate risks to ensure human health and environmental safety. These domestic regulatory frameworks align to in...
#1Jock R. Anderson (RU: Rutgers University)
#1Jock R. Anderson (RU: Rutgers University)
Last. Carl E. Pray (RU: Rutgers University)H-Index: 36
view all 5 authors...
#1Lori A. Post (NU: Northwestern University)H-Index: 23
#2Andrew Schmitz (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 34
Last. James F. OehmkeH-Index: 20
view all 4 authors...
#1Siphe Zantsi (Stellenbosch University)H-Index: 3
#2Jan C. Greyling (Stellenbosch University)H-Index: 4
#1Siphe Zantsi (Stellenbosch University)H-Index: 3
#2Gabriele MackH-Index: 5
Last. Nick Vink (Stellenbosch University)H-Index: 14
view all 3 authors...
1 CitationsSource
#1V. PolarH-Index: 4
Last. Hale TufanH-Index: 10
view all 4 authors...
This paper examines the question of what makes choice empowering and critiques prevalent approaches to empowerment focused narrowly on agency as the ability of individuals to make their own free choices and act independently. The implications of a narrow focus on agency are illustrated with the examples of technology choice in agriculture, specifically choices involved in the adoption of improved plant varieties. This example elucidates the limits of individual agency and permits an analysis of ...