ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF INFERTILITY RESOURCES ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB: TOOLS TO GUIDE CLIENTS THROUGH THE MAZE OF FACT AND FICTION
Abstract
The Internet has become a major source of health information for women, but information placed on the World Wide Web does not routinely undergo a peer review process before dissemination. In this study, we present an analysis of 197 infertility-related Web sites for quality and accountability, using JAMA's minimal core standards for responsible print. Only 2% of the web sites analyzed met all four recommended standards, and 50.8% failed to...
Paper Details
Title
ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF INFERTILITY RESOURCES ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB: TOOLS TO GUIDE CLIENTS THROUGH THE MAZE OF FACT AND FICTION
Published Date
Jul 8, 2002
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
264 - 268
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History