Why Feasibility Matters More to Gift Receivers than to Givers: A Construal-Level Approach to Gift Giving

Published on Jun 1, 2014in Journal of Consumer Research
· DOI :10.1086/675737
Ernest Baskin9
Estimated H-index: 9
(Yale University),
Cheryl J. Wakslak22
Estimated H-index: 22
(SC: University of Southern California)
+ 1 AuthorsNathan Novemsky17
Estimated H-index: 17
(Yale University)
This article looks at the trade-offs that gift givers and gift receivers make between desirability and feasibility using construal level theory as a framework. Focusing on the asymmetric distance from a gift that exists within giver-receiver dyads, the authors propose that, unlike receivers, givers construe gifts abstractly and therefore weight desirability attributes more than feasibility attributes. Support for this proposition emerges in studies examining giver and receiver mind-sets, as well as giver and receiver evaluations of gifts. Furthermore, givers do not choose gifts that maximize receiver happiness or other relationship goals even though givers believe they are doing so. Finally, the authors demonstrate that while givers are sensitive to their distance from the receiver, receivers are not sensitive to this distance.
Figures & Tables
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
4,152 Citations
59 Citations
1,180 Citations
#1Marcel MaussH-Index: 31
view all 1 authors...
1,772 Citations
#1Caglar Irmak (USC: University of South Carolina)H-Index: 11
#2Cheryl J. Wakslak (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 22
Last. Yaacov Trope (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 71
view all 3 authors...
Four studies demonstrate that selling and buying prices are differentially influenced by the value of products' low- and high-level construal features. The study shows that sellers construe products at a higher level than do buyers and owners. Based on this, this study predicts and demonstrates that selling prices exceed buying prices when (1) the object's primary aspects are superior and the object's secondary aspects are inferior but not vice versa, (2) individuals focus on a product's desirab...
37 CitationsSource
#1Jingyi Lu (PKU: Peking University)H-Index: 6
#2Xiaofei Xie (PKU: Peking University)H-Index: 15
Last. Jingzhe Xu (Bank of China)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
Making decisions for the self and providing advice to others are common in daily life. The current research examines the differences in weight that people attach to desirability and feasibility when deciding for themselves versus others. Based on construal level theory, we propose that in a decision-making process, individuals who decide for others tend to focus more on desirability than on feasibility compared with those who decide for themselves. Across five experiments, the predicted self–oth...
52 CitationsSource
5 CitationsSource
#1Joseph P. Simmons (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 27
#2Leif D. Nelson (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 33
Last. Uri Simonsohn (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 30
view all 3 authors...
In this article, we accomplish two things. First, we show that despite empirical psychologists’ nominal endorsement of a low rate of false-positive findings (≤ .05), flexibility in data collection, analysis, and reporting dramatically increases actual false-positive rates. In many cases, a researcher is more likely to falsely find evidence that an effect exists than to correctly find evidence that it does not. We present computer simulations and a pair of actual experiments that demonstrate how ...
3,340 CitationsSource
#1Francesca Gino (Harvard University)H-Index: 57
#2Francis J. Flynn (Stanford University)H-Index: 24
article i nfo Five studies show that gift recipients are more appreciative of gifts they explicitly request than those they do not. In contrast, gift givers assume that both solicited and unsolicited gifts will be equally appreciated. At the root of this dilemma is a difference of opinion about what purchasing an unsolicited gift signals: gift givers expect unsolicited gifts will be considered more thoughtful and considerate by their intended recipients than is actually the case (Studies 1-3). I...
59 CitationsSource
#1Debora V. Thompson (Georgetown University)H-Index: 14
#2Michael I. Norton (Harvard University)H-Index: 49
Abstract Previous research has shown that consumers frequently choose products with too many features that they later find difficult to use. In this research, the authors show that this seemingly suboptimal behavior may actually confer benefits when factoring in the social context of consumption. The results demonstrate that choosing products with more capabilities (i.e., feature-rich products) provides social utility beyond inferences of wealth, signaling consumers' technological skills and ope...
51 CitationsSource
Four studies investigate whether decisions for others produce more creative solutions than do decisions for the self and if construal level explains this relation. In Study 1, participants carried out a structured imagination task by drawing an alien for a story that they would write, or alternatively for a story that someone else would write. As expected, drawing an alien for someone else produced a more creative alien. In Studies 2a and 2b, construal level (i.e., psychological distance) was in...
93 CitationsSource
First published in 1922, this classic text examines the extensive and complex trading system maintained by the Trobriand Islanders. While the main theme is economics and social organization, the power of magic, mythology and folklore are also examined.
827 Citations
#1Yaacov Trope (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 71
#2Nira Liberman (TAU: Tel Aviv University)H-Index: 50
People are capable of thinking about the future, the past, remote locations, another person’s perspective, and counterfactual alternatives. Without denying the uniqueness of each process, it is proposed that they constitute different forms of traversing psychological distance. Psychological distance is egocentric: Its reference point is the self in the here and now, and the different ways in which an object might be removed from that point—in time, in space, in social distance, and in hypothetic...
4,152 CitationsSource
Cited By87
#1Ruomeng Wu (Western Kentucky University)H-Index: 1
#2Mary Steffel (NU: Northeastern University)H-Index: 11
Last. Sharon Shavitt (UIUC: University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign)H-Index: 32
view all 3 authors...
Abstract Gift purchasing is an important factor driving the retail industry around the world, and yet, many gift selections do not match recipient preferences. Three studies examine how consumers from different cultures select gifts for multiple recipients and when gifts deviate from recipients’ preferences. Both U.S. and Chinese consumers who are shopping for multiple recipients tend to pass up recipients’ preferred gifts in favor of getting distinct gifts for each recipient, and Chinese givers...
#1Evan Polman (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 15
#2Zoe Y. Lu (Tulane University)
#1Hung M. Dao (University of Leeds)
#2Aristeidis Theotokis (University of Leeds)H-Index: 11
#1Julian Givi (WVU: West Virginia University)H-Index: 4
Abstract When a gift is given from a giver to a recipient, there is often an expectation that the recipient will reciprocate, for example, during the winter holidays. However, recipients do not always have gifts to return to their givers for such “reciprocatory occasions.” They might be unaware beforehand, for instance, that the giver will be giving them one. This research examines whether givers accurately assess how uncomfortable recipients feel when they fail to reciprocate a giver’s gift for...
#1Peggy J. Liu (University of Pittsburgh)H-Index: 11
#2Ernest Baskin (""St. Joe's"": Saint Joseph's University)H-Index: 9
The trade-off between quality and quantity pervades many domains of life, including that of making product choices for ourselves and others, whether as gifts or as everyday favors. In five studies ...
2 CitationsSource
#2Véronique Cova (AMU: Aix-Marseille University)H-Index: 9
Cet article propose une synthese des recherches ayant mobilise le concept de distance psychologique autour des questions liees aux comportements prosociaux du consommateur, a la digitalisation de l...
#1Scott ConnorsH-Index: 3
#2Mansur KhamitovH-Index: 5
Last. Andrew PerkinsH-Index: 10
view all 4 authors...
#1Peikai Li (RUC: Renmin University of China)H-Index: 2
#2Jian-Min Sun (RUC: Renmin University of China)
Last. Toon W. Taris (UU: Utrecht University)H-Index: 65
view all 3 authors...
Although scholars have long been interested in distinguishing gift giving from bribery, the impact of the degree of guanxi between a giver and a recipient on this distinction remains unclear. Drawi...
#1Zhe Zhang (Fudan University)
#2Xinmeng Wang (Fudan University)
Last. Ruiqi Wu (UR: University of Rochester)
view all 3 authors...
Abstract Prior to purchase decision-making in regard to experience services in electronic commerce, consumers tend to check the reviews for the intended purchase online. Realizing the importance of online word-of-mouth marketing, online retailers offer a bonus to motivate consumers to write reviews. While great attention is paid to the reviewers, few efforts are exerted in regard to the readers of the reviews. Focusing on the mindsets of readers in their perception process, our research explores...
#1Yufeng Zhang (BNU: Beijing Normal University)H-Index: 5
#2Mo Luan (UIBE: Beijing Institute of Foreign Trade)H-Index: 3
Last. Yiling Ren (THU: Tsinghua University)
view all 4 authors...
Abstract. In the present research, we documented a novel but largely ignored the effect of intuition versus deliberation on individuals’ preferences between desirability and feasibility. Our findin...