Random intercept EFA of personality scales

Published on Dec 1, 2014in Journal of Research in Personality3.068
· DOI :10.1016/J.JRP.2014.07.001
Julian Aichholzer8
Estimated H-index: 8
(University of Vienna)
Sources
Abstract
Previous research suggests that simple structure CFAs of Big Five personality measures fail to accurately reflect the scale’s complex factorial structure, whereas EFAs generally perform better. Another strand of research suggests that acquiescence or uniform response bias masks the scale’s “true” factorial structure. Random Intercept EFA (RI-EFA) captures acquiescence as well as the complex item-factor structure typical for personality measures. It is applied to the NEO-FFI and the BFI scale to test whether an accurate model-to-data fit can be achieved and whether the “clarity” of the factorial structure improves. The results lend confidence in the general effectiveness of RI-EFA whenever acquiescence bias is an issue. Example Mplus code is provided for replication.
Figures & Tables
Download
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
References15
Newest
#1Tom Booth (Edin.: University of Edinburgh)H-Index: 24
#2David J. Hughes (University of Manchester)H-Index: 14
The current article compares the use of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) as an alternative to confirmatory factor analytic (CFA) models in personality research. We compare model fit, factor distinctiveness, and criterion associations of factors derived from ESEM and CFA models. In Sample 1 (n = 336) participants completed the NEO-FFI, the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire–Short Form, and the Creative Domains Questionnaire. In Sample 2 (n = 425) participants completed the ...
Source
The poor performance of five-factor personality inventories in confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) prompted some to question their construct validity. Others doubted the CFA’s suitability and suggested applying Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM). The question arises as to what impact the application of either method has on the construct validity of personality inventories. We addressed this question by applying ESEM and CFA to construct better-fitting, though more complex models bas...
Source
#1Beatrice Rammstedt (Leibniz Association)H-Index: 34
#2Richard F. Farmer (Oregon Research Institute)H-Index: 23
Acquiescence, or the tendency to respond to descriptions of conceptually distinct personality attributes with agreement/affirmation (acceptance acquiescence) or disagreement/opposition (counter-acquiescence), has been widely recognized as a source of bias that can substantially alter interitem correlations within scales. Acquiescence is also known to operate differently among some groups of persons; it is, for example, more pronounced among individuals with less formal education. Consequently, t...
Source
#1Philip M. PodsakoffH-Index: 68
#2Scott B. MacKenzieH-Index: 54
Last. Nathan P. Podsakoff (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 26
view all 3 authors...
Despite the concern that has been expressed about potential method biases, and the pervasiveness of research settings with the potential to produce them, there is disagreement about whether they really are a problem for researchers in the behavioral sciences. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to explore the current state of knowledge about method biases. First, we explore the meaning of the terms “method” and “method bias” and then we examine whether method biases influence all measures e...
Source
#1Herbert W. Marsh (University of Oxford)H-Index: 187
#2Oliver Lüdtke (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 78
Last. Benjamin Nagengast (University of Oxford)H-Index: 42
view all 7 authors...
NEO instruments are widely used to assess Big Five personality factors, but confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) conducted at the item level do not support their a priori structure due, in part, to the overly restrictive CFA assumptions. We demonstrate that exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), an integration of CFA and exploratory factor analysis (EFA), overcomes these problems with responses (N = 3,390) to the 60-item NEO Five-Factor Inventory: (a) ESEM fits the data better and resul...
Source
#1Christopher J. Hopwood (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 59
#2M. Brent Donnellan (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 76
Personality trait inventories often perform poorly when their structure is evaluated with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The authors demonstrate poor CFA fit for several widely used personality measures with documented evidence of criterion-related validity but also show that some measures perform well from an exploratory factor analytic perspective. In light of these results, the authors suggest that the failure of these measures to fit CFA models is because of the inherent complexity of p...
Source
#1Beatrice Rammstedt (Leibniz Association)H-Index: 34
#2Lewis R. Goldberg (Oregon Research Institute)H-Index: 72
Last. Ingwer Borg (Leibniz Association)H-Index: 27
view all 3 authors...
Previous findings suggest that the Big-Five factor structure is not guaranteed in samples with lower educational levels. The present study investigates the Big-Five factor structure in two large samples representative of the German adult population. In both samples, the Big-Five factor structure emerged only in a blurry way at lower educational levels, whereas for highly educated persons it emerged with textbook-like clarity. Because well-educated persons are most comparable to the usual subject...
Source
#1Ivana Anusic (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 11
#2Ulrich Schimmack (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 52
Last. Penelope Lockwood (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 18
view all 4 authors...
In light of consistently observed correlations among Big Five ratings, the authors developed and tested a model that combined E. L. Thorndike’s (1920) general evaluative bias (halo) model and J. M. Digman’s (1997) higher order personality factors (alpha and beta) model. With 4 multitrait–multimethod analyses, Study 1 revealed moderate convergent validity for alpha and beta across raters, whereas halo was mainly a unique factor for each rater. In Study 2, the authors showed that the halo factor w...
Source
#1Tihomir AsparouhovH-Index: 32
#2Bengt Muthén (UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles)H-Index: 92
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is a frequently used multivariate analysis technique in statistics. Jennrich and Sampson (1966) solved a significant EFA factor loading matrix rotation problem by deriving the direct Quartimin rotation. Jennrich was also the first to develop standard errors for rotated solutions, although these have still not made their way into most statistical software programs. This is perhaps because Jennrich's achievements were partly overshadowed by the subsequent developm...
Source
#1Albert Maydeu-Olivares (University of Barcelona)H-Index: 27
#2Donna L. Coffman (PSU: Pennsylvania State University)H-Index: 24
The common factor model assumes that the linear coefficients (intercepts and factor loadings) linking the observed variables to the latent factors are fixed coefficients (i.e., common for all participants). When the observed variables are participants’ observed responses to stimuli, such as their responses to the items of a questionnaire, the assumption of common linear coefficients may be too restrictive. For instance, this may occur if participants consistently use the response scale idiosyncr...
Source
Cited By38
Newest
#1Gina PancorboH-Index: 3
#2Ricardo PrimiH-Index: 29
Last. Filip De FruytH-Index: 66
view all 5 authors...
Educational practitioners have been increasingly interested in the use of formative assessment and rubrics to develop social-emotional skills in children and adolescents. Although social-emotional rubrics are nowadays commonly used, a thorough evaluation of their psychometric properties has not been conducted. In this non-exhaustive review, we examine the knowns and unknowns of the use of formative assessment approaches and rubrics in social-emotional learning. We first review initiatives of for...
Source
#1Zeynep CemalcilarH-Index: 19
#2Lemi BaruhH-Index: 11
Last. Oliver P. JohnH-Index: 89
view all 6 authors...
Source
#1Julian Aichholzer (University of Vienna)H-Index: 8
#2Clemens M. Lechner (Leibniz Association)H-Index: 13
People and societies differ in their tendency to justify inequalities and group hierarchies, a motivation that has been labelled social dominance orientation (SDO). In order to efficiently measure this motivational tendency, Pratto and colleagues (2013, https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612473663) proposed the four-item Short Social Dominance Orientation (SSDO) scale. The present study comprehensively assesses the SSDO scale’s psychometric properties in seven European countries (Austria, Czech Repu...
Source
#1Andrea Westphal (University of Potsdam)H-Index: 4
#2Rebecca Lazarides (University of Potsdam)H-Index: 11
Last. Miriam Vock (University of Potsdam)H-Index: 11
view all 3 authors...
BACKGROUND Building on the Realistic Accuracy Model, this paper explores whether it is easier for teachers to assess the achievement of some students than others. Accordingly, we suggest that certain individual characteristics of students, such as extraversion, academic self-efficacy, and conscientiousness, may guide teachers' evaluations of student achievement, resulting in more appropriate judgements and a stronger alignment of assigned grades with students' actual achievement level (as measur...
Source
Source
#1Lucas de Francisco Carvalho (USF: Universidade São Francisco)H-Index: 16
#2Nelson Hauck Filho (USF: Universidade São Francisco)H-Index: 6
Last. Lia Rocha (USF: Universidade São Francisco)
view all 5 authors...
OBJECTIVE The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Personality Disorders (IIP-PD-47) has a controversial factor structure, as some studies have provided support for 5 correlated factors, and others have suggested the existence of a general second-order dimension. One approach of data modelling that reconciles multidimensionality and the existence of a general factor is the bifactor analysis. We used unrestricted exploratory-confirmatory bifactor modelling to validate the Brazilian version of the ...
Source
#1Bo Zhang (A&M: Texas A&M University)H-Index: 6
#2Yi Ming Li (Beijing Institute of Education)H-Index: 3
Last. Oliver P. John (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 89
view all 9 authors...
The Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) has received wide recognition since its publication because it strikes a good balance between content coverage and brevity. The current study translated the BFI-2 into Chinese, evaluated its psychometric properties in four diverse Chinese samples (college students, adult employees, adults treated for substance use, and adolescents), and compared its factor structure with those obtained from two U.S. samples. Across two studies, the Chinese BFI-2 demonstrated good...
Source
#1Andrea WestphalH-Index: 4
#2Miriam VockH-Index: 11
Last. Julia KretschmannH-Index: 4
view all 3 authors...
The Big Five personality traits play a major role in student achievement. As such, there is consistent evidence that students that are more conscientious receive better teacher-assigned grades in secondary school. However, research often does not support the claim that students that are more conscientious similarly achieve higher scores in domain-specific standardized achievement tests. Based on the Invest-and-Accrue Model, we argue that conscientiousness explains to some extent why certain stud...
Source
#1Conrad Ziller (University of Cologne)H-Index: 7
#2Carl C. Berning (University of Mainz)H-Index: 7
ABSTRACTThis study investigates how personality relates to citizens’ willingness to extend political, social, and cultural rights for minorities, including voting rights for immigrants, religious rights for Muslims, and affirmative action measures. Moving beyond explanations centred on intergroup relations, we argue that political efficacy (i.e. beliefs about personal political competences and the responsiveness of political elites) operates as a mechanism linking personality and policy preferen...
Source
#1Daniel DannerH-Index: 20
#2Clemens M. Lechner (Leibniz Association)H-Index: 13
Last. René MõttusH-Index: 30
view all 4 authors...
Personality can be described at different levels of abstraction. Whereas the Big Five domains are the dominant level of analysis, several researchers have called for more fine-grained approaches, s...
Source
This website uses cookies.
We use cookies to improve your online experience. By continuing to use our website we assume you agree to the placement of these cookies.
To learn more, you can find in our Privacy Policy.