Clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Volume: 8, Issue: 5, Pages: 957 - 970
Published: May 1, 2010
Abstract
Pretest probability assessment is necessary to identify patients in whom pulmonary embolism (PE) can be safely ruled out by a negative D-dimer without further investigations.Review and compare the performance of available clinical prediction rules (CPRs) for PE probability assessment.We identified studies that evaluated a CPR in patients with suspected PE from Embase, Medline and the Cochrane database. We determined the 95% confidence intervals...
Paper Details
Title
Clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published Date
May 1, 2010
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
957 - 970
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.