Should Usual Criteria for Intervention in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Be “Downsized,” Considering Reported Risk Reduction with Endovascular Repair?

Volume: 1085, Issue: 1, Pages: 47 - 58
Published: Nov 1, 2006
Abstract
: Two randomized trials have demonstrated the safety of waiting until abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter reaches 5.5 cm for repair in most patients. Other recent randomized trials have demonstrated lower perioperative mortality and morbidity with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared to open surgery. Therefore, it is logical to assume that endovascular repair may change the appropriate threshold for intervention. However,...
Paper Details
Title
Should Usual Criteria for Intervention in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Be “Downsized,” Considering Reported Risk Reduction with Endovascular Repair?
Published Date
Nov 1, 2006
Volume
1085
Issue
1
Pages
47 - 58
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.