Confronting prejudice: Thewho,what, andwhyof confrontation effectiveness
Abstract
Following a task that ostensibly revealed implicit racism or sexism, participants were confronted about their bias. The confronter's race and gender were manipulated to test whether group membership (whether one is part of the group experiencing prejudice) determined confrontation effectiveness. Results showed that the confrontation of racism met with greater acceptance when performed by a White than a Black confronter, indicating that group...
Paper Details
Title
Confronting prejudice: Thewho,what, andwhyof confrontation effectiveness
Published Date
Oct 1, 2013
Journal
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
280 - 293
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History