Money can’t buy love: Asymmetric beliefs about gift price and feelings of appreciation

Published on Feb 1, 2009in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
· DOI :10.1016/J.JESP.2008.11.003
Francis J. Flynn24
Estimated H-index: 24
(Stanford University),
Gabrielle S. Adams8
Estimated H-index: 8
(Stanford University)
Sources
Abstract
Abstract Across three studies, we identify an asymmetry between gift-givers’ and gift-recipients’ beliefs about the link between gift price and feelings of appreciation. Gift-givers expected a positive correlation between how much they spent on a gift and the extent to which gift-recipients would appreciate the gift because gift-givers assume that more expensive gifts convey a higher level of thoughtfulness. Gift-recipients, in contrast, reported no such association between gift price and their actual feelings of appreciation. This effect occurred regardless of whether the individual’s role and the magnitude of the gift were manipulated or measured in the field. Taken together, these findings cast doubt on whether gift-givers can draw on their personal experience as gift-recipients in order to identify meaningful gifts for others.
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
59 Citations
561 Citations
354 Citations
References27
Newest
#1Marcel MaussH-Index: 31
view all 1 authors...
1,772 Citations
First published in 1922, this classic text examines the extensive and complex trading system maintained by the Trobriand Islanders. While the main theme is economics and social organization, the power of magic, mythology and folklore are also examined.
827 Citations
#1Francis J. Flynn (Columbia University)H-Index: 24
#2Vanessa K. B. Lake (Columbia University)H-Index: 1
A series of studies tested whether people underestimate the likelihood that others will comply with their direct requests for help. In the first 3 studies, people underestimated by as much as 50% the likelihood that others would agree to a direct request for help, across a range of requests occurring in both experimental and natural field settings. Studies 4 and 5 demonstrated that experimentally manipulating a person’s perspective (as help seeker or potential helper) could elicit this underesti...
198 CitationsSource
#1Philip L. RothH-Index: 37
#2Fred S. SwitzerH-Index: 18
11 CitationsSource
#1Marvin D. DunnetteH-Index: 23
An up-to-date handbook on conceptual and methodological issues relevant to the study of industrial and organizational behavior. Chapters contributed by leading experts from the academic and business communities cover substantive issues at both the individual and organizational level, in both theoretical and practical terms.
6,999 Citations
#1Karl Halvor Teigen (University of Oslo)H-Index: 27
#2Marina V. G. Olsen (University of Tromsø)H-Index: 1
Last. Odd Egil Solås (University of Tromsø)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
When people are asked to choose between gift items, givers and receivers sometimes show different patterns of preferences. The article reports four experimental studies exploring these giver–receiver asymmetries. Whereas givers tend to prefer exclusive, but smaller gift items, receivers appear to prefer less luxurious, and more useful gifts (Experiment 1). Givers prefer gift vouchers to cash, and are concerned about timing, whereas more receivers accept cash gifts, and claim that it does not mat...
56 CitationsSource
#1Daniel R. Ames (Columbia University)H-Index: 27
#2Francis J. Flynn (Columbia University)H-Index: 12
Last. Elke U. Weber (Princeton University)H-Index: 71
view all 3 authors...
How do people react to those who have helped them? The authors propose that a recipient’s evaluation of a helper’s intentions and the recipient’s own attitudes about future interactions with the helper depend partly on the recipient’s perceptions of how the helper decided to assist: on the basis of affect, of role, or of cost-benefit calculation. When a recipient perceives that the decision was based on affect (i.e., positive feelings about him or her), he or she will be more inclined toward fut...
145 CitationsSource
#1Francis J. Flynn (Columbia University)H-Index: 24
#2Joel Brockner (Columbia University)H-Index: 56
The present research examines episodes of favor exchange among peer employees. We posit that favor receivers' and favor givers' commitment to their exchange relationships with one another will be accounted for by different factors. As predicted, in 2 different organizational contexts, receivers' commitment to their relationships with givers was found to be more related to their judgments of the givers' interactional justice when performing the favor, whereas givers' commitment to their relations...
110 CitationsSource
Cited By103
Newest
#1Ruomeng Wu (Western Kentucky University)H-Index: 1
#2Mary Steffel (NU: Northeastern University)H-Index: 11
Last. Sharon Shavitt (UIUC: University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign)H-Index: 32
view all 3 authors...
Abstract Gift purchasing is an important factor driving the retail industry around the world, and yet, many gift selections do not match recipient preferences. Three studies examine how consumers from different cultures select gifts for multiple recipients and when gifts deviate from recipients’ preferences. Both U.S. and Chinese consumers who are shopping for multiple recipients tend to pass up recipients’ preferred gifts in favor of getting distinct gifts for each recipient, and Chinese givers...
Source
#1Evan Polman (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 15
#2Zoe Y. Lu (Tulane University)
Source
#1Julian Givi (WVU: West Virginia University)H-Index: 4
Abstract When a gift is given from a giver to a recipient, there is often an expectation that the recipient will reciprocate, for example, during the winter holidays. However, recipients do not always have gifts to return to their givers for such “reciprocatory occasions.” They might be unaware beforehand, for instance, that the giver will be giving them one. This research examines whether givers accurately assess how uncomfortable recipients feel when they fail to reciprocate a giver’s gift for...
Source
#1Julian Givi (WVU: West Virginia University)H-Index: 4
#2Jeff Galak (CMU: Carnegie Mellon University)H-Index: 19
Source
#1Daniel M. Grossman (UMSL: University of Missouri–St. Louis)
#2Ryan Rahinel (UC: University of Cincinnati)H-Index: 8
Source
#1Yookyung Park (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 1
#2Youjae Yi (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 37
Abstract The main purpose of this research is to investigate whether, why, and when givers and recipients perceive the value of a discounted gift differently. The studies provide convergent evidence that givers perceive discounted gifts as less valuable than regular-priced gifts whereas recipients do not perceive them as different. Givers' devaluation of the discounted gift is driven by their concern about the thoughtfulness of a gift. Moreover, the giver-recipient asymmetry is mitigated when th...
Source
#1Julian Givi (WVU: West Virginia University)H-Index: 4
#2Jeff Galak (CMU: Carnegie Mellon University)H-Index: 19
Last. Christopher Y. Olivola (CMU: Carnegie Mellon University)H-Index: 17
view all 3 authors...
3 CitationsSource
#1Yilu Wang (PKU: Peking University)H-Index: 2
#2Xiaofei Xie (PKU: Peking University)H-Index: 15
Source
#1Jie Sun (CPP: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona)H-Index: 2
#2Nadia Hanin Nazlan (UiTM: Universiti Teknologi MARA)H-Index: 2
Last. Billy Bai (UNLV: University of Nevada, Las Vegas)H-Index: 23
view all 4 authors...
Source
#1Sisi Li (HKU: University of Hong Kong)H-Index: 1
#2Jacky C. K. Ng (Hong Kong Shue Yan University)H-Index: 5
Last. Chin Ming Hui (CUHK: The Chinese University of Hong Kong)H-Index: 12
view all 3 authors...
Source