How and why criteria defining moderators and mediators differ between the Baron & Kenny and MacArthur approaches.
Abstract
In recognition of the increasingly important role of moderators and mediators in clinical research, clear definitions are sought of the two terms to avoid inconsistent, ambiguous, and possibly misleading results across clinical research studies.The criteria used to define moderators and mediators proposed by the Baron & Kenny approach, which have been long used in social/behavioral research, are directly compared to the criteria proposed by the...
Paper Details
Title
How and why criteria defining moderators and mediators differ between the Baron & Kenny and MacArthur approaches.
Published Date
Jan 1, 2008
Journal
Volume
27
Issue
2, Suppl
Pages
S101 - S108
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History