Comments on ‘Analysing and interpreting competing risk data’ (original article and author's reply) by Melania Pintilie, Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26:1360–1367; DOI: 10.1002/sim.2655 (original article) and Statistics in Medicine 2007; DOI: 10.1002/sim.2822 (author's reply)
Abstract
Statistics in MedicineVolume 26, Issue 18 p. 3521-3523 Letter to the Editor Comments on ‘Analysing and interpreting competing risk data’ (original article and author's reply) by Melania Pintilie, Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26:1360–1367; DOI: 10.1002/sim.2655 (original article) and Statistics in Medicine 2007; DOI: 10.1002/sim.2822 (author's reply) Marcel Wolbers, Marcel Wolbers wolbersm@uhbs.ch Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology,...
Paper Details
Title
Comments on ‘Analysing and interpreting competing risk data’ (original article and author's reply) by Melania Pintilie, Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26:1360–1367; DOI: 10.1002/sim.2655 (original article) and Statistics in Medicine 2007; DOI: 10.1002/sim.2822 (author's reply)
Published Date
May 2, 2007
Journal
Volume
26
Issue
18
Pages
3521 - 3523
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History