Ilgaz Arikan
Kent State University
FinancePolitical economySociologyBusinessEconomicsMarketingMicroeconomicsWork (electrical)Valuation (finance)International businessFactor marketMarket valueKnightian uncertaintyContext (language use)Dynamic capabilitiesInternational relationsIndustrial organizationProcess (engineering)Resource (project management)Social psychologyInternationalizationTransaction cost
22Publications
7H-index
109Citations
Publications 26
Newest
#1Ilgaz Arikan (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 7
#2Oded Shenkar (Max M. Fisher College of Business)H-Index: 51
The international business (IB) field is maturing and developing conceptual frameworks, dedicated applications, and precise tools. In the course of this progression, the field has started to break away from its disciplinary roots, establishing parsimonious models using finely tuned but confined approaches. While fruitful in solidifying the sovereignty of the field, this progression comes at the expense of detecting and building on major undercurrents that define the rich IB context. We return he...
Source
#1Ilgaz Arikan (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 7
#2Asli M. Arikan (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 10
Last. Oded Shenkar (Max M. Fisher College of Business)H-Index: 51
view all 3 authors...
We revisit the new perspectives that explain the internationalization and growth of multinational enterprises (MNEs) in emerging markets (EMs). Do we need a new theory for EM MNEs? Are the new theorizing efforts seeking the “just right” approach as in the Goldilocks story justified? We beg to disagree. We draw attention to the foundations of current international business (IB) and organization theories, rooted in culture, history, institutions, economics, strategy, and market dynamics to meet th...
Source
#1Shuo Yang (KSU: Kent State University)
#2Asli M. Arikan (KSU: Kent State University)H-Index: 10
Last. Ilgaz Arikan (KSU: Kent State University)H-Index: 7
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Asli M. Arikan (GSU: Georgia State University)H-Index: 10
#2Ilgaz Arikan (KSU: Kent State University)H-Index: 7
Last. Ipek Koparan (KSU: Kent State University)H-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
Creation theory suggests that opportunity formation is endogenous to the actions of entrepreneurs. However, this characterization of the opportunity formation process suggests at least two importan...
Source
#1Shuo Yang (KSU: Kent State University)
#2Asli M. Arikan (KSU: Kent State University)H-Index: 10
Last. Ilgaz Arikan (KSU: Kent State University)H-Index: 7
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Ipek Koparan (Bentley University)H-Index: 2
#2Ilgaz Arikan (KSU: Kent State University)H-Index: 7
Last. Asli M. Arikan (KSU: Kent State University)H-Index: 10
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Chengguang LiH-Index: 6
#2Ilgaz Arikan (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 7
Last. Asli M. Arikan (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 10
view all 4 authors...
Our work examines the impact of country-dyadic military conflicts on market reaction to cross-border acquisitions (CBAs). Building on intergroup relations research, we theorize that country-dyadic military conflicts, weighted by their severity, trigger intergroup conflicts between the merging firms and, in so doing, hamper market reaction to CBA. Drawing on a sample that comprises 7321 CBAs between 1988 and 2011, we find that country-dyadic military conflicts reduce acquirer returns following CB...
Source
#1Ilgaz Arikan (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 7
#2Asli M. Arikan (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 10
Last. Oded Shenkar (Max M. Fisher College of Business)H-Index: 51
view all 3 authors...
Research Summary This paper explores why and how nation‐dyadic history impacts aggregated firm decisions involving cross‐border activities (acquisitions, joint ventures, and alliances). We contextualize history and illustrate the negative effect of historical conflict on cross‐border deals. Nation‐dyads with historical conflict incorporate negative sentiments into their social and collective memories and national identities. Members of society assume the socially constructed national identity vi...
Source
#1Ilgaz Arikan (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 7
#2Ipek Koparan (OSU: Oklahoma State University–Stillwater)H-Index: 2
Last. Oded Shenkar (Max M. Fisher College of Business)H-Index: 51
view all 4 authors...
We study MNEs that tie their long-lasting competitiveness and internationalization to the deployment of their heritage assets, administrative heritage, and signature processes built in their home markets. When faced with changes, these “authentic” firms scan for and buffer against threats to their signature processes, use their heritage endowment to focus on their capacity to maintain and defend their niches, and preserve their capacity for stability. We complement the traditional dynamic capabi...
Source
#1Ipek Koparan (KSU: Kent State University)H-Index: 2
#2Asli M. Arikan (KSU: Kent State University)H-Index: 10
Last. Shuo Yang (KSU: Kent State University)
view all 4 authors...
Source
This website uses cookies.
We use cookies to improve your online experience. By continuing to use our website we assume you agree to the placement of these cookies.
To learn more, you can find in our Privacy Policy.