Eva Weißkopf
Free University of Berlin
Competence (human resources)MetacognitionFeelingMode (statistics)Computerized classification testEducational psychologyComputerized adaptive testingPsychologyCognitive psychologyModerated mediationTest (assessment)Fear of failureTest takerApplied psychologySocial psychologyAchievement testSituational ethicsModeration
3Publications
2H-index
15Citations
Publications 3
Newest
#1Tuulia M. Ortner (University of Salzburg)H-Index: 13
#2Eva Weißkopf (FU: Free University of Berlin)H-Index: 2
Last. Tobias Koch (FU: Free University of Berlin)H-Index: 15
view all 3 authors...
We investigated the effects of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) versus computerized fixed item testing (FIT) of reasoning ability on current motivation in terms of situational fear of failure and subjective probability of success, as well as flow. A group of 174 students (aged 15–21) from two German secondary schools was presented either a CAT or a FIT version of a matrices test; motivational variables were assessed during a short break in testing. More situational fear of failure and less su...
9 CitationsSource
#1Tuulia M. Ortner (FU: Free University of Berlin)H-Index: 13
#2Eva Weißkopf (FU: Free University of Berlin)H-Index: 2
Last. Friederike X. R. Gerstenberg (TUM: Technische Universität München)H-Index: 7
view all 3 authors...
We investigated students' metacognitive experiences with regard to feelings of difficulty (FD), feelings of satisfaction (FS), and estimate of effort (EE), employing either computerized adaptive testing (CAT) or computerized fixed item testing (FIT). In an experimental approach, 174 students in grades 10 to 13 were tested either with a CAT or a FIT version of a matrices test. Data revealed that metacognitive experiences were not related to the resulting test scores for CAT: test takers who took ...
6 CitationsSource
#1Tuulia M. OrtnerH-Index: 13
#2Eva WeißkopfH-Index: 2
Source